Friday, February 19

I Won't Allow Masquerades Testify Against Me - Nnamdi Kanu Blasts FG Today in Court

I Won't Allow Masquerades Testify Against Me - Nnamdi Kanu Blasts FG Today in Court

Nnamdi Kanu showing a sign of solidarity to his supporters after a court appearance

Director of Radio Biafra who appeared in court for trials today in Abuja has opposed the application of the federal government to protect the identities of witnesses in his trial, describing them as 'masquerades'.

Embattled leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has opposed the application of the President Buhari-led federal government to protect the identities of witnesses in his trial, describing them as 'masquerades'.

As the hearing of the application of Radio Biafra director began, counsel to the Department of State Services (DSS), David Kaswe, the prosecution, informed Justice John Tsoho of the federal high court, Abuja, that there was a possibility for witnesses to refuse testifying against Kanu, without protection.

David Kaswe, the prosecution emphasised that it was important that witnesses be protected in the trial, explaining that the crux of the application was to seek the protection of witnesses, and not to cause a secret trial.

Counsel to Kanu, Chuks Muoma (SAN), argued that what the prosecution was asking for was a secret trial, and prayed the court to draw a distinction between a closed trial and protection of witnesses. He added that the application implied that masked individuals would be testifying before the court.

However, the prosecution countered his argument, saying that most of the witnesses were civilians who reside in the location of the accused person, and were as such vulnerable to influence. "We also ask that these press men will not make public identities and residential locations of these witnesses," he said.

Citing section 364 of the 1999 constitution (as amended), Muoma, said that there was no provision for 'masquerades' to testify as witnesses in a case as such as that of Kanu. He explained that protection of witnesses could only be applied to terrorism cases, and not to that of his client, who is facing charges of treasonable felony.

"An accused person under our jurisprudence must be confronted with his accusers eyeball to eyeball. My lord, it is compatible and common sense with jurisprudence that you cannot accuse someone in the streets in public and try him in the bedroom."

After listening to the arguments of the counsel, the judge adjourned the matter to 2:00pm for ruling.

No comments :

Trending News

Other News That You May Like